I was talking to a pastor at a seeker-friendly church not long ago about his idea that prospective Christians needed to “feel welcome” and “accepted” before anything else: no “threats,” no “judgmental baggage.”
I asked, “If you had a person living in sin come to your church, would you confront him?”
He furrowed his brow and shook his head diapprovingly. “Oh, no! We’d want him to feel loved and welcome.”
My eyes widened. “How long would it be before you would actually say something about that?”
“Maybe a year and a half, two years,” he said, smiling. “Because then he would really feel a part of things.”
That was shocking to me. Is there some virtue in leaving a man in his sin for the sake of feeling accepted? “Well, that’s the difference between your church and our church,” I said finally. “Openly practicing sinners come to our church, and they either get saved or they don’t come back.”
- John MacArthur, Hard to Believe p.162
|
|
3 CommentsLeave a Reply |




I confront the person if he opens up and I hear the story from him/her.
If it's openly practiced sin, and the person is a supposed member of the church, church discipline must be exercised by the pastorate. And yes, we as lay-people and fellow members in the body of Christ should and must confront them ourselves too for the sanctity of the Word and Gospel.
The dividing line is here though, there are those who confront but not in the basis of truth, but in the basis of preference. Yet there are those too who confront, masquerading themselves as defender of truth and Gospel yet putting the person in question in damning despair and despondency.
Confrontation of sin must be rooted from the Word and the Gospel of free grace, through the Spirit of God, only there can true repentance and reconciliation can be achieved.
If it's openly practiced sin, and the person is a supposed member of the church, church discipline must be exercised by the pastorate. And yes, we as lay-people and fellow members in the body of Christ should and must confront them ourselves too for the sanctity of the Word and Gospel.
The dividing line is here though, there are those who confront but not in the basis of truth, but in the basis of preference. Yet there are those too who confront, masquerading themselves as defender of truth and Gospel yet putting the person in question in damning despair and despondency.
Confrontation of sin must be rooted from the Word and the Gospel of free grace, through the Spirit of God, only there can true repentance and reconciliation can be achieved.